• State Suggested Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 62 subscribers
  • Views 3942 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

ActiveRoles 6.1 and schema / FFL upgrade

JP3
over 7 years ago

Hi everyone,
I have inherited an old implementation of ActiveRoles 6.1.

We are about to make some AD changes -- in particular to extend our schema from 2008R2 to 2012R2 and to raise the forest/domain functional levels from 2003 to 2008R2.

Have any of you made either of these changes while running ActiveRoles 6.1?

If so, were there any problems?

I suspect nothing will break, but since I am new to ActiveRoles, and the version is old/unsupported, I wanted to check here first.

Thanks in advance for any information or advice you have.

Parents
  • 0 over 7 years ago
    I advise read ARS 6.1 SysReq and deduce from there what is exactly supported.
    In theory, potential issues, I may guess:
    (a) Exchange Mbx management via ARS WI/UI
    (b) Lync issues
    (c) other apps relying on AD schema extension attributes, ARS 6.1 was not tested against.
Reply
  • 0 over 7 years ago
    I advise read ARS 6.1 SysReq and deduce from there what is exactly supported.
    In theory, potential issues, I may guess:
    (a) Exchange Mbx management via ARS WI/UI
    (b) Lync issues
    (c) other apps relying on AD schema extension attributes, ARS 6.1 was not tested against.
Children
No Data