This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Steve Confused (and amazed a little)

In Production: ARS v6.9
In Testing: Active Roles v7.0

So last week I "captured" my production v6.9 database and copied it into a test Active Role 7.0 installation,using the Configuration Center (which is great stuff, BTW).

That process went smoothly and at the end of the process, my AR70 installation had production data, in particular Dynamic Groups and Managed Units (and their respective rules, of course).

Here's what confuses me....

Yesterday I created a new Dynamic Group in my Production ARS v6.9 system. I did nothing in my AR70 system (in fact, the admin service was stopped, as it often is for my testing).

After I started the admin service on AR70, I found my Dynamic Group, rules and all, visible and usable in AR70. I don't understand how AR70 would know anything about the rules of this group, which, again, I created yesterday and never "migrated" to AR70.

Does this confuse anyone else? How smart/connected is AR70 actually?
Thanks for any feedback.
 -Steve

Parents
  • that's correct. Dynamic Groups product design got dedicated nuances:

    (a) DG configuration is stored in on AD group object in some attribute (you may find it) in XML format

    (b) (not relevant to the question, but to mention) DG is based on ARS listening DC MSFT DirSync events

    Conclusion: it is dangerous for two independent ARS instances 6..x and 7.x(upgraded and inherited 6.x configuration) to hit the same AD scope in long run in general. One of examples is DG group overlap and intererance is unavoidable here. In general you must get error on one of servers: cannot add member to the group because he is in the group (already been added by another install) - it is a harmless error and during short period of time of upgrade.

Reply
  • that's correct. Dynamic Groups product design got dedicated nuances:

    (a) DG configuration is stored in on AD group object in some attribute (you may find it) in XML format

    (b) (not relevant to the question, but to mention) DG is based on ARS listening DC MSFT DirSync events

    Conclusion: it is dangerous for two independent ARS instances 6..x and 7.x(upgraded and inherited 6.x configuration) to hit the same AD scope in long run in general. One of examples is DG group overlap and intererance is unavoidable here. In general you must get error on one of servers: cannot add member to the group because he is in the group (already been added by another install) - it is a harmless error and during short period of time of upgrade.

Children
No Data